Ice vs MaggiesMagic — Difference, Contrast & Harmony

Icenearest vs MaggiesMagicexact

#D8EEEB · #DDEEE2

Four independent scores (read the one that fits your goal): Readability 0/100 (fail) · Harmony 98/100 (analogous) · Distinguishable 15/100 (hard to tell apart) · Match 89/100 (near match). There is no single “good/bad” — a pair can clash for text yet be great for an outfit.

Readability0Fail

The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.

Fail1.0:1

Harmony98Analogous

Analogous

34° apart

Distinguishable15Hard to tell apart

normal

tritanopia

ΔE 4.9 (3.6 under CVD)

Match89Near match

ΔE 4.9 — near match

How different are Ice and MaggiesMagic?

Ice and MaggiesMagic are very close (ΔE 5). They have distinctly different hues (34° apart) and their lightness is similar, so they read as two same-weight colours.

Can you read one on the other?

Ice text on MaggiesMagic: 1.00:1 (Fail); MaggiesMagic text on Ice: 1.00:1 (Fail). Neither meets AA at body size — nudging one color to #5A6D6B clears it.

Common questions

Do Ice and MaggiesMagic go well together?

Analogous — analogous — a recognised, balanced pairing (harmony 98/100). This is about how they look together (clothing, interiors, branding), independent of text contrast.

Is Ice readable as text on MaggiesMagic?

Not at body size — the best direction is only 1.0:1, below the 4.5:1 minimum. Nudging one colour to #5A6D6B clears AA.

What is the colour difference (ΔE) between Ice and MaggiesMagic?

Their CIE76 ΔE is about 5 — very close.

Are Ice and MaggiesMagic the same colour?

a very near match (ΔE 4.9) — fine for most matching.

Related comparisons